The Structure
Five products, one file. Notice where the capital actually comes from: the real estate secures itself, the machinery secures itself, and the acquiring company’s own receivables fund another $1.4M before a single dollar of enterprise value is priced. Only $1.2M needed a term loan — and that number was set by the buyer’s revenue, not the seller’s balance sheet.
No single lender writes an $8.2M check on a competitor acquisition. Five underwritten together, funded it in 22 days
Representative structure
| Layer | Amount | What it covered |
|---|---|---|
| Owner-occupied commercial real estate | $3.8M | Three production facilities, roughly 10% down against the property itself |
| A/R facility | $1.4M | The acquiring company’s receivables, converted to acquisition capital at close |
| Business acquisition term loan | $1.2M | Balance of enterprise value, against the acquirer’s revenue and operating history |
| Equipment financing | $1.2M | Machinery across all three plants — each asset secures its own piece |
| Working capital | $600K | Integration, payroll, and running three floors as one operation |
| Total | $8.2M | Funded together on one application |
Larger structures fund the same way when revenue, cash flow, and story qualify.
The Transaction

Bobby Friel
Founder, Basecamp Funding
This is the version of an acquisition nobody warns you about: the business is right, the price is right, and the only real question is whether the money moves before somebody else’s does.
A regional manufacturer moved to acquire a competitor — three production facilities, $12M in combined revenue — and had to move before another buyer did. A bank would have spent months on it. The specialist desk structured an $8.2M stack against the acquiring company’s revenue rather than a single pledge: owner-occupied real estate financing took the three facilities at roughly 10% down, an A/R facility turned the buyer’s own receivables into acquisition capital, a term loan carried the balance of enterprise value, an equipment line covered the machinery, and working capital funded the integration. One application, one advisor, funded in 22 days.
Underwriting
A bank underwrites the company being sold. This structure underwrote the company doing the buying — and that single difference is most of why a competitor acquisition stalls in committee and moves through a marketplace.
The Bank
Three aging plants, depreciated machinery, thin retained earnings, and a customer list it cannot pledge. It prices the target, discounts what it can’t monitor, and arrives at a number well below what the business is worth to an operator who already runs one.
This Structure
An operator with existing revenue, deposit history, and a decade of running the same kind of floor — buying capacity they already know how to use. Five separate assets, five lenders, each pricing the piece it underwrites every day.
What the buyer is actually purchasing is $12M of combined revenue attached to customer relationships and three operating floors. None of that appears on a balance sheet in a form a credit committee can lend against. So the committee falls back on what it can appraise — the real estate and the iron — and the enterprise value gets treated as goodwill, which most banks will not finance at any meaningful multiple. The gap becomes the buyer’s problem to close in cash.
Revenue-based acquisition financing reads the buying company’s file: its revenue, its deposits, its record running the same operation. That is the true test of whether this transaction gets serviced after close, because the buyer is the one who will run it. It also means there is no fixed down-payment rule to satisfy on the acquisition piece — what the structure supports is a function of the acquirer’s revenue, not a percentage a policy manual chose in advance.
Buying the plants and buying the business are two different transactions, and most lenders will only do one of them. That is worth saying plainly, because a search for a plant acquisition loan returns commercial mortgage lenders who finance the buildings and stop there — while an operator acquiring a competitor needs the buildings, the machinery, and the enterprise value in a single coordinated structure. Three production facilities are the largest single asset in this transaction, and they are also the easiest to finance correctly. Owner-occupied commercial real estate is underwritten against the property, not the goodwill — which means $3.8M of the purchase resolves against buildings the buyer will occupy and operate. A bank blending that into one acquisition loan applies its most conservative assumption to the whole thing. Financed separately, the real estate carries itself.
This is the layer most operators never consider. The acquiring manufacturer was already carrying $1.4M in receivables on 45-to-60 day terms — revenue it had earned and was waiting on. An A/R facility converts that to cash at close. It is the buyer funding a piece of the purchase out of work already performed, rather than out of new debt priced against an acquisition.
The machinery across all three plants doesn’t need to be squeezed into an acquisition loan’s collateral package. Financed as equipment, each asset secures its own piece — which is exactly what equipment lenders do every day and exactly what a bank treats as an exception. Another $1.2M resolves before anyone argues about enterprise value.
After the real estate, the receivables, and the machinery, only $1.2M of enterprise value needed a term loan. A $1.2M decision underwritten on a known operator’s revenue moves in days. An $8.2M decision at one bank, against the wrong company’s financials, moves in months — and a competitor acquisition does not have months. Another buyer was already at the table. The last $600K covered what nobody budgets: running three floors as one operation while the integration is still in progress.
The Products
| Product | Role here |
|---|---|
| Commercial Real Estate → | Three production facilities, underwritten against the property |
| Accounts Receivable Financing → | The acquirer’s receivables converted to acquisition capital |
| Business Acquisition Financing → | Balance of enterprise value, against the acquirer’s revenue |
| Equipment Financing → | Machinery across all three plants — each asset its own collateral |
| Working Capital → | Integration, payroll, and consolidating three floors |
Financing this whole sector: Manufacturing Financing →
The Result
Start Here
Sixty seconds, no documents, and a soft-pull review. If you’re acquiring a business and want to know what your revenue supports before you sign, this is where that starts.
~60-second review · Soft-pull, FICO untouched · No obligation
No obligation. Soft-pull review — your FICO stays untouched.
Related
Representative scenarios — illustrative, anonymized figures, not specific client transactions.
FAQ
Rarely with one loan. A manufacturing acquisition usually contains several assets that finance better separately than together — the real estate the plants sit on, the machinery inside them, and the enterprise value of the business itself. Financing each against the lender that underwrites it best is what makes the full number reachable, and it is why a multi-layer structure funds transactions a single bank loan cannot.
For revenue-based acquisition financing, the acquiring company’s file carries the transaction — its revenue, deposit history, and operating record. That is the measure of whether the combined business gets serviced after close, because the buyer is the one running it. A bank does the opposite: it underwrites the target’s balance sheet, which is why its number often comes in below what the business is worth to an operator who already knows the work.
There is no fixed percentage on the acquisition piece. What the structure supports is a function of the acquiring company’s revenue and cash flow, not a policy figure. The real estate layer is different — commercial property is underwritten against the property itself, and owner-occupied structures typically require materially less down than a conventional bank’s terms on the same building.
Yes, and it is one of the most overlooked sources of acquisition capital available to an established manufacturer. If the buying company is carrying receivables on 45-to-60 day terms, an A/R facility converts that earned revenue to cash at close. It funds a piece of the purchase out of work already performed rather than out of new debt priced against the transaction.
Yes, and most of the guidance you will find online assumes otherwise. Search for a loan to buy a manufacturing business and nearly every result is framed around SBA 7(a) parameters — which is one path, and not always the right one. The timeline is the usual problem: a competitive acquisition rarely waits for it. Revenue-based structures underwrite on the acquiring company’s cash flow and can fund in days to a few weeks, and a multi-layer structure can reach a number a single SBA loan caps out below. The trade-offs differ in real ways, and a specialist should walk you through both before you commit to either.
No, and conflating them is the most common mistake in this transaction. A plant acquisition loan finances real property — the buildings, underwritten against the property itself. Buying the business means acquiring the operating entity: the revenue, the customer relationships, the machinery, and the people running it. Most lenders will do one or the other. An operator acquiring a competitor with facilities needs both financed in one coordinated structure, which is why the real estate, the equipment, and the enterprise value each go to the lender that prices that piece best.
A prepared file with clean statements, a signed purchase agreement, and a clear picture of what is being acquired can fund in a few weeks; this one funded in 22 days across five layers. What slows a transaction is almost never the lenders — it is assembling documents after the clock has already started. The operators who move fastest have the application and bank statements ready before they need them.