Staffing Capital · Specialist Lenders · $250K–$20M+

Payroll Funding for Staffing Companies — Your Client Pays in 60 Days. Payroll Runs Friday.

Every placement you make is money out before it's money in. You cover the contractor this week; the client's AP department pays on its own calendar. Grow, and the gap grows with you — which is why staffing agencies stall at the exact moment demand is strongest. One file reaches the lenders who fund the receivable rather than the balance sheet: payroll funding, staffing factoring, and a working-capital line that scales with placement volume instead of capping it.

Request a Financing Review

Takes ~60 seconds · Soft-pull review · Underwritten on your client invoices, not your assets

Representative structure

One File, $250K–$20M+

Payroll funding / staffing factoring$250K–$5M
Client invoices advanced in days, so contractors are paid on your schedule
Working capital line$250K–$5M
The widening gap as placement volume grows — draw and repay per cycle
Purchase order financing$250K–$5M
Fund a large contract award before the first timesheet is billed
Term structure for expansion$250K–$5M
A new desk or a new market
Acquisition financing$250K–$20M+
A competitor’s book or a multi-desk agency, financed on the combined billings
One file$20M+

One application, competing specialist lenders — the product that fits each need, stacked into the full number.

Invoicesare the collateralScales withplacement volume600+ creditor advisor helps6+ monthsoperatingIT, light industrialhealthcare, clerical

Sound Familiar?

You Turned Down the Order Because You Couldn't Float the Payroll.

The client wants twelve more contractors starting Monday. You can recruit twelve — that part you're good at. What you can't do is carry $95,000 of payroll every two weeks for the eleven weeks it takes their AP department to pay the first invoice. So the order gets sized down, or slow-walked, or passed to the agency across town who had the capital and not the candidates.

If payroll were never the constraint — how many of the orders you've sized down in the last year would you have staffed in full?

Bobby Friel

Bobby’s Take

Staffing is the cleanest financing problem I see, and the one most often solved with the wrong product. The business isn't short of demand or short of recruiters — it's short of the float between paying people and getting paid for them. That's a receivable, and a receivable is financeable. What doesn't work is a daily-debit advance against a service business with no card volume; the repayment shape doesn't match the cash flow it comes out of. Finance the invoice, size a line to the volume behind it, and the ceiling every agency owner knows the exact height of simply stops being there. So: what's the first order you'd staff in full?

Bobby Friel, Founder, Basecamp Funding · 20+ years in banking and finance

The Real Problems

The Real Problems on Your Desk — and What Solves Each One

What it costs youWhat solves itTypical rangeSpeed
Payroll before the client paysContractors paid weekly or biweekly; clients pay net-45 to net-90.Payroll funding / staffing factoring$250K–$5M+1–3 days
Growth widens the gapEvery new placement increases the float you carry, so success tightens cash.Working-capital line sized to volume$250K–$5M+Days
A large contract awardWinning a big account means staffing it before a single invoice bills.Purchase order financing$250K–$5M+Days
The bank wants hard assetsA staffing firm's balance sheet is people and invoices, not collateral a bank recognizes.Receivables-based underwriting$250K–$5M+Days
Client concentrationOne account is most of your book, and every lender flags it.Facilities structured around concentration$250K–$5M+Days
Burden costs beyond wagesWorkers' comp, payroll taxes, and benefits land before the invoice does.Working capital covering full burden$250K–$5M+Days
Acquiring a competitor's bookA retiring owner's desk or client list needs capital faster than a bank moves.Acquisition financing / stack$250K–$5M+Weeks

Larger facilities available when revenue, receivables quality, and story qualify.

Commercial insurance for your operation → InsuranceService365.com (29 states).

The Numbers That Matter

The Float Is the Business Model

Net-45 to net-90

typical client payment terms in commercial staffing, against contractor payroll that runs weekly or biweekly.

Staffing industry payment-terms benchmarks, 2026

~1.3×

the payroll you front for every dollar of wages once employer taxes, workers' comp, and benefits are counted.

Employer burden estimates, 2026

Every placement

adds float. Growth is what tightens cash in staffing, not what loosens it.

Basecamp Funding underwriting files

Capital Stacking

One File. The Payroll and the Growth Behind It.

Most agencies need two things at once: the receivable financed so this Friday's payroll clears, and a facility that keeps up as placement volume climbs. A bank prices the whole request against the riskiest thing it sees — a service business with no hard collateral and one big client. A marketplace splits it: the invoice financed by the lender who underwrites receivables, the operating gap covered by the lender who underwrites cash flow, both stacked into one number.

The ceiling every agency owner knows the exact height of — removed, not raised.

How a $1.2M staffing facility gets funded

Accounts receivable financing$800K
Client invoices advanced as they bill — scales with placement volume.
Working capital line$300K
Burden costs and the gap the advance doesn't cover.
Purchase order financing$100K
Ramp cost on a new contract award, before the first timesheet.
Funded together$1.2M

Need more than the receivable alone? The remainder stacks — for the full structure, see commercial financing.

Agencies We've Funded

Staffing Companies We've Funded

Representative scenarios — illustrative, anonymized figures, not specific client transactions.

IT Staffing financing case study — The Net-60 Gap
IT StaffingThe Net-60 Gap

An IT staffing agency placed twelve contractors at an enterprise client on net-60. Receivables financing turned each invoice into cash in three days, so payroll never depended on the client's AP calendar.

3 days
Invoice to cash
Net-60
Bridged
0
Placements interrupted
Light Industrial financing case study — The Contract Award
Light IndustrialThe Contract Award

A light-industrial agency won a warehouse account requiring forty workers on site before the first invoice billed. Purchase order financing funded the ramp; the receivables facility took over once billing started.

40
Workers placed
Week one
Fully staffed
Kept
The account
Healthcare Staffing financing case study — The Travel Desk
Healthcare StaffingThe Travel Desk

A healthcare staffing firm carried travel nurse payroll plus housing stipends against hospital systems paying net-75. A working-capital line covered full burden while the receivables facility handled the invoices.

Net-75
Absorbed
Burden
Fully covered
Scaled
Not capped
Clerical & Admin financing case study — The Concentration Problem
Clerical & AdminThe Concentration Problem

A clerical agency had one client at most of its book — an automatic decline at two banks. The desk structured a facility around the concentration rather than pretending it wasn't there.

Funded
Despite concentration
2
Bank declines before
Days
To term sheet
Skilled Trades Staffing financing case study — The Growth Ceiling
Skilled Trades StaffingThe Growth Ceiling

A trades agency had turned away three orders in a year because payroll math didn't work. A facility that scaled with receivables removed the ceiling; the fourth order was staffed in full.

3
Orders previously lost
Scales
With volume
None
Turned away since
Multi-Desk Agency financing case study — The Acquisition
Multi-Desk AgencyThe Acquisition

A regional agency acquired a retiring competitor's client book. Acquisition financing was structured on the combined billings, with the receivables facility resized to carry both desks from day one.

Acquired
Client book
Two desks
One facility
Weeks
To funded

Funded, In Detail

Structures We’ve Funded in Staffing

Real transactions, written up in full — the structure, the numbers, and the timeline.

Browse every funded transaction

Start Here

Find Your Structure in 60 Seconds

Move the slider for your estimated range, then answer three quick questions to lock it in. No documents to start. Soft-pull review — no score impact.

What Happens When You Start

Your capital range appears as you answer
Auto-advances as you go — no extra clicks
No hard inquiry — your credit stays untouched
A real specialist reviews your file — not an algorithm
No obligation — see your capital range and decide
Estimate
Revenue
History
Contact

Estimate Your Capital Range

Slide to your annual gross revenue. We size capital off your top line — not your credit score.

$500K$10M$150M+

Estimated Capital Range

$1M$1.5M

A conservative range based on 10-15% of annual revenue — many businesses qualify for more with strong receivables or assets behind them. Lenders return real term sheets once they see your file.

60 seconds · No obligation · Estimate only

5.0★★★★★78 ReviewsBasecamp Funding BBB Business Review

What an operator hears every week

A staffing agency isn't limited by demand or by recruiting. It's limited by how much payroll it can carry before the invoices come back.

Bobby Friel · Founder, Basecamp Funding

Why Us

Why Staffing Firms Fund Here Instead of at a Bank

Your bankBasecamp's marketplace
Collateral“Where are the hard assets?”The client invoice is the asset — that's the whole structure
Client concentrationOne big client is an automatic flagStructured around concentration, not declined for it
SpeedWeeks, while Friday keeps arrivingInvoice to cash in days, every cycle
GrowthA fixed limit set once a yearA facility that scales as placement volume does
Burden costsWages only, if anythingPayroll taxes, comp, and benefits covered too
PaperworkFull financials and two years of returnsMinutes, minimal documents, receivables-first
Credit pullHard credit pullSoft-pull review, no score impact

The Real Cost

What Has the Ceiling Already Cost You?

Every agency owner knows the exact height of their ceiling, because they hit it every payroll cycle. If it weren't there — what's the first order you'd staff in full?

Structure Your Capital Plan →
A client asks for twelve and you quote six, because six is what the payroll account can carry until their AP runs.
The order you slow-walked went to the agency across town — and so did the account behind it.
Your recruiters are good enough to fill roles you can't afford to staff, which is a strange way to run a growing business.
And the competitor who financed their receivables two years ago — how much of your market do they hold now?

Avoid These

5 Funding Mistakes That Cost Staffing Firms the Most

1
Taking a daily-debit advance against a service business.

A staffing firm has invoices, not card volume. An advance repaid on a daily schedule doesn't match the cash flow it comes out of, and the mismatch shows up fast.

2
Sizing the facility to today's payroll instead of next year's.

Every placement adds float. A limit set to this quarter's volume becomes the ceiling by the next one — size it to where the desk is going.

3
Financing wages and forgetting the burden.

Payroll taxes, workers' comp, and benefits land with the wages. A facility covering gross wages alone leaves you short every cycle.

4
Hiding client concentration from the lender.

Concentration is normal in staffing and it gets structured around — but only if it's on the table from the start. Discovered later, it kills the file.

5
Waiting for the order before arranging the capital.

The award comes with a start date. A facility already in place is the difference between staffing it in full and quoting half.

Put It to Work

Use Your Capital For

01Contractor payrollSee howLessHow much payroll are you carrying right now against invoices that haven't paid?

Receivables financing that turns each client invoice into cash in days.

Structure this
02Full employer burdenSee howLessWhat do payroll taxes, comp, and benefits add on top of the wages you front?

Working capital sized to the real cost of a placement, not the wage line.

Structure this
03A new contract awardSee howLessWhat would you need on day one to staff the account you just won?

Purchase order financing for the ramp, before the first timesheet bills.

Structure this
04Opening a new deskSee howLessWhich vertical would you open a desk in if the first two quarters were funded?

A term structure for recruiters, tooling, and the ramp to billing.

Structure this
05Entering a new marketSee howLessWhat city or specialty is sitting there because the float looked too big?

Working capital for the expansion, with the receivables facility following the billings.

Structure this
06Acquiring a client bookSee howLessWhose retiring desk or client list would you buy if capital weren't the obstacle?

Acquisition financing structured on the combined billings.

Structure this
07Recruiter headcountSee howLessHow many more roles could you fill with two more recruiters on the floor?

Capital for headcount ahead of the billings it produces.

Structure this
08Back-office and ATSSee howLessWhat is your applicant tracking system costing you in placements it can't keep up with?

Financing for the infrastructure, deductible in year one.

Structure this
09Absorbing longer termsSee howLessWhat happens when your best client moves from net-45 to net-75?

A facility that absorbs the change instead of passing it to your contractors.

Structure this
10Bridging a slow collectionSee howLessWhat covers payroll when one large invoice sits past terms?

A revolving line so a single slow payer isn't a payroll emergency.

Structure this
11Seasonal volume swingsSee howLessHow much capacity do you need at peak that you don't need in February?

Draw at the peak, repay as it passes — capacity you only pay for when used.

Structure this
12Consolidating expensive positionsSee howLessWhat would cash flow look like with the high-cost advances rolled into one facility?

Consolidate now; once payment history is built, better terms follow — get funded first, optimize later.

Structure this

Funding by the Size of the Need

Funded at Every Stage

One application, competing specialist lenders — and a file underwritten on receivables funds in days, whether the need is $250K or $20M+.

Growing

Growing Agencies

Funding

$250K–$1M

Receivables financing and a working-capital line — approved on client invoice quality and placement volume, not hard collateral.

Request a Financing Review →
Established

Established Agencies

Funding

$1M–$5M

A facility that scales with billings, plus purchase order financing for new awards and working capital for full employer burden — mapped by a dedicated advisor.

Structure Your Capital Plan →
Commercial & Complex

Commercial & Complex

Funding

$5M–$20M+

Multi-desk agency acquisitions and client-book roll-ups — buying a competitor’s desks, absorbing their billings, and financing the combined receivables as one facility. Stacked across lenders on a single file.

See Your Capital Architecture →

How It Works

From Qualifier to Funded in Five Steps

No paperwork avalanche. No bank lobby. No guessing.

1

Qualify

A few questions about the business, right here. No documents to start.

2

Application

A soft credit pull and a quick document review to pre-underwrite the file.

3

Matched to the Right Lenders

The specialist lenders who fund your business - the right lender on each piece.

4

One Advisor, Real Term Sheets

Your advisor brings back real term sheets, not estimates, and walks the structure.

5

Structured & Funded

Accept the structure that fits, sign digitally - funded in days, not months.

For the application, have ready

4 months of business bank statementsP&L and balance sheetBusiness tax returns

Under two years in business, or the returns show a loss? We can structure on bank statements alone.

Full Transparency

What Kills Your Qualification — and What Doesn't

Most lenders won't tell you this up front. We will.

Won't Stop You
Receivables quality and client credit drive approvals, not your balance sheet
No hard assets to pledge
Thin margins — normal in staffing and understood
Client concentration, when it's disclosed up front
Less than two years in business (6+ months is fine)
A prior bank denial
Rapid growth that has outrun your cash
Deal-Breakers
Under six months operating
No business checking account
Invoices already pledged to another lender and undisclosed
Active undischarged bankruptcy
Chronically negative daily balances
Heavy NSF / overdraft activity
Unpaid payroll tax liabilities left undisclosed

By Specialty

Funding by Staffing Specialty

Every desk — funded around how its billings actually land.

IT & TechnicalEnterprise clients on long terms, high bill rates, and contractors who expect to be paid on time.
Light IndustrialHigh headcount, weekly pay, and contract awards that need staffing before the first invoice.
Healthcare & Travel NursingHospital systems paying net-75 against payroll plus housing and stipends.
Clerical & AdministrativeSteady placement volume where the whole business is the float between pay and collect.
Skilled TradesConstruction and industrial trades where a single project award can double your payroll.
Professional & FinanceLonger placements, larger invoices, and clients whose AP cycles run on their own calendar.
EngineeringProject-based contracts with milestone billing and extended terms.
Hospitality & EventsSharp seasonal peaks that need capacity at the top and cost nothing at the bottom.
Logistics & WarehousePeak-season ramps where headcount triples before a single invoice is paid.
Executive SearchFee-based billings on longer cycles — working capital between placements.
PEO & Employer of RecordFull employer burden carried on someone else's payroll calendar.
Direct Hire & Contract-to-HireMixed billing models where part of the book invoices and part converts.

The structure follows the receivable: who the client is, how they pay, and how fast the desk is growing.

Recommended Products

The Products Staffing Firms Fund With

Matched to how the billings actually land — and stacked into the full number when one isn't enough.

Picture It

What Does the Agency Look Like When Payroll Stops Being the Constraint?

The order staffed in full instead of quoted at half. The contract award taken on the client's timeline rather than your payroll account's. Recruiters filling roles you can actually afford to place. Contractors paid on Friday whether or not a client's AP department ran that week — which is how you keep the good ones. And the ceiling you've been managing around for years simply not there. If the float were financed and the facility grew with you — what would you have booked last year instead of turning it down?

Request a Financing Review

FAQs

Staffing Financing — Questions Agency Owners Ask

It's financing structured against your client invoices so contractor payroll doesn't wait on the client's payment terms. You bill the client as normal; the facility advances against that invoice in days, and settles when the client pays. The receivable is the collateral, which is why it works for a business with no hard assets.

Factoring advances against specific invoices as they bill, so the capacity moves with your billings automatically. A working-capital line is a limit you draw against for any operating need — including the employer burden a straight invoice advance may not fully cover. Most agencies past a certain size run both.

Usually yes. Client concentration is normal in staffing and gets structured around rather than declined — the underwriting looks at that client's own credit and payment history. What causes problems is concentration discovered late in the file rather than disclosed at the start.

That's the point of financing the receivable rather than taking a fixed loan. As placement volume rises, so do the invoices behind it, and the facility scales with them — without a new application or a renegotiated limit each time.

The full employer burden runs well above gross wages, and a facility sized only to wages leaves you short every cycle. Working capital is layered alongside the receivables advance so the whole cost of a placement is covered, not just the paycheck.

Once the facility is set up, most advances land within one to three business days of billing. Initial approval is faster than a bank's — the file is receivables-first, so it's your client invoices and bank statements rather than two years of returns.

Purchase order financing covers the ramp — recruiting, onboarding, and the first payroll cycles on a new account — before there's an invoice to advance against. Once billing starts, the receivables facility takes over.

No. A soft-pull review has zero impact on your FICO. A hard pull only happens if you choose to move forward with a specific lender's offer.

The Operator's Guide

Staffing Financing, the Way the Billings Actually Land

Why the gap widens exactly when things go well

Staffing runs on a timing mismatch that never closes on its own. You pay contractors weekly or biweekly. Your clients pay on net-45, net-60, sometimes net-75, and the clock doesn't start until the invoice goes out. Every placement you add pushes more money out the door before any of it comes back — which means growth tightens cash instead of loosening it. That's not a sign of a weak business. It's the shape of the model.

A bank reads that shape badly. It wants collateral, and a staffing firm's assets are people who go home at five and invoices that haven't paid yet. So the answer is usually no, or a limit small enough to be beside the point. The lenders who fund staffing underwrite the receivable instead: who the client is, how reliably they pay, and how fast the billings are growing.

Finance the receivable, then size the line to the volume

The clean structure is two layers. Accounts receivable financing advances against client invoices as they bill, so payroll clears on your schedule rather than the client's. A working-capital line sits alongside it for the part an invoice advance doesn't reach — payroll taxes, workers' comp, benefits, and the ramp on a new account. Purchase order financing covers a large award before there's anything to bill against. Every layer scales with the billings behind it, which is why the ceiling stops being fixed.

What doesn't fit is a daily-debit advance. A staffing agency has invoices and no card volume, so a product repaid on a fixed daily schedule takes money out on a rhythm the business doesn't earn on. If you're weighing one, that's the conversation to have first. Start the review — a few minutes, soft-pull, no score impact.

Keep Reading

Where Operators Go From Here

The rest of the map — the products, the industries, and the two calculators worth running before you talk to anyone.

Don't Wait

The Order Starts Monday. Your Capital Should Already Be in Place.

Payroll funding, staffing factoring, working capital for full employer burden, and purchase order financing for a new award — one application reaches competing specialist lenders, and a specialist structures the right product or stacks several into $250K–$20M+, funded in days.

Request a Financing Review →

~60-second soft-pull review · Underwritten on your client invoices · Funded in days