The Structure
Capital Stack Breakdown for a $2.4M Restaurant Group Acquisition
Two products, one file. The business value across three units was carried by a term loan underwritten on the group’s actual deposits — twelve months of bank statements across three locations, not a category label. Working capital covered the part every restaurant acquisition guide skips: the sixty days when the new owner is running three kitchens on the old owner’s vendor terms.
A bank declines restaurants by reflex. Two products underwritten on the deposits funded three of them in 8 days
Representative structure
| Layer | Amount | What it covered |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition term loan | $1.9M | Business value across three units, underwritten on the group’s trailing twelve months of deposits |
| Working capital | $500K | The transition: three payrolls, vendor accounts re-papered in the new name, and the first sixty days of inventory |
| Total | $2.4M | Funded together on one application |
Larger restaurant groups fund the same way when deposits, cash flow, and story qualify.
The Transaction
What the Buyer Was Acquiring
Bobby Friel
Founder, Basecamp Funding
The restaurant version of the acquisition nobody warns you about: the units are profitable, the kitchens are trained, the seller likes you — and the only thing standing between you and the signature is whether your money moves before the other buyer’s does.
A three-unit seafood concept came up for sale — established locations, trained kitchens, a seller ready to retire — and the seller was 30 days from signing with another buyer. There was no time for a bank’s process, and a bank would not have liked the file anyway: restaurants are the category credit committees decline by reflex. The specialist desk structured a $2.4M acquisition stack against the group’s own revenue — a term loan for the business value across three units, and working capital for the ownership transition — and funded it before the competing offer could land.
Underwriting
How a Restaurant Business Loan Actually Gets Underwritten
A bank underwrites the category. This structure underwrote the deposits — and that difference is why one path was never going to happen in thirty days and the other took eight.
The Bank
What a bank sees.
The word restaurant. Then, if it keeps reading: leased locations it cannot lend against, kitchen equipment that appraises at a fraction of cost, a purchase price that is mostly goodwill, and an industry failure statistic it has memorized. Most decline at the category. The ones that don’t quote a timeline the seller cannot wait for.
This Structure
What this structure saw.
Three units with twelve months of consistent daily deposits, a combined revenue that had held through two summers, a buyer already operating in the trade, and a seller motivated to hand over trained staff intact. Deposits are what a restaurant actually has. They are simply not on a bank’s form.
Why Banks Decline Restaurants Before They Read the File
Restaurants are the one category most credit committees have a policy against, and the policy is not about the specific operator. It is about the absence of collateral the bank recognizes — leased space, depreciated equipment, and a business value that is almost entirely goodwill. So the file is declined or discounted before anyone looks at whether the units make money. A three-unit group that has deposited consistently for years gets treated exactly like a first-time operator with a concept.
Underwriting on Deposits, Not the Category
Revenue-based acquisition financing reads the bank statements. Three locations, twelve months, daily deposits — that is the whole story of whether a restaurant group can service a loan, and it is a better predictor than anything a credit committee appraises. The buyer’s own operating record in the trade priced the transaction; the group’s deposits set what it could carry. No collateral debate, because the deposits were the collateral.
Why the Competing Buyer Had a Head Start — and Lost
The other buyer was thirty days from signing, and most sellers take the certain offer over the better one. A private buyer waiting on a bank cannot match that certainty, and everyone at the table knows it. The only way to win is to be the certain one: a $1.9M decision underwritten on twelve months of statements moves in days. A $2.4M restaurant acquisition at one bank moves in months, if it moves at all.
The Transition Is Where Restaurant Acquisitions Actually Fail
The last $500K covered what the purchase price does not: three payrolls running before the combined deposits settle in the new entity’s account, every vendor account re-papered in the buyer’s name (with new terms, usually worse), and the first sixty days of inventory bought without the seller’s credit history behind it. Buyers who fund the purchase and not the transition spend their first quarter short on cash in three kitchens at once.
What Three Locations Actually Buy
A three-unit group is not three restaurants — it is a purchasing operation, a shared management layer, and a brand a landlord will negotiate with. Vendor pricing improves at volume. A general manager can be hired across units. And the group is now the kind of asset a regional operator pays a multiple for, which is the buyer’s exit to think about later, on the buyer’s timeline.
Run the arithmetic your own way: what did your best unit deposit last month, and what would three of them do under one vendor contract?
For most operators at this scale, the structure is serviced out of deposits the units already produce. That is a different question than whether a bank has a policy about your category.
The Products
The Products That Funded This Transaction
| Product | Role here |
|---|---|
| Business Acquisition Financing → | Business value across three units, underwritten on the group’s deposits |
| Working Capital → | Three payrolls, vendor accounts re-papered, and sixty days of inventory |
Financing this whole sector: Restaurant Financing →
The Result
What Changed After Close
Start Here
See What Your Deposits Support
Sixty seconds, no documents, and a soft-pull review. If you’re buying a restaurant or a group and want to know what your revenue actually carries before you sign a letter of intent, this is where that starts.
~60-second review · Soft-pull, FICO untouched · No obligation
No obligation. Soft-pull review — your FICO stays untouched.
Related
Similar Structures
Representative scenarios — illustrative, anonymized figures, not specific client transactions.
FAQ
Getting a Restaurant Business Loan to Buy a Group — Questions, Answered
Can you get a business loan to buy a restaurant?
Yes, though usually not from a bank — most decline the category before reading the file. Revenue-based acquisition financing underwrites the restaurant’s deposits: twelve months of bank statements, daily consistency, and the buyer’s own record in the trade. Structured with working capital for the transition, it reaches the full purchase price on a timeline a seller will actually wait for.
Why do banks turn down restaurant loans?
Because the collateral a bank recognizes isn’t there. Restaurants operate in leased space, their equipment appraises at a fraction of cost, and the business value is mostly goodwill. Add an industry failure statistic the committee has memorized, and the file is declined at the category rather than on the operator. A profitable three-unit group and a first-time concept get the same answer.
What do lenders look at when financing a restaurant acquisition?
Deposits, first. Trailing twelve months of bank statements across every unit being acquired tell the whole story of whether the group can service a loan. Then the buyer’s own operating record — an operator already in the trade is a different credit than a first-time owner. Category, lease terms, and equipment value matter far less than a bank’s form suggests.
How much do you need down to buy a restaurant group?
There is no fixed percentage on a revenue-based acquisition. What the structure supports is a function of the group’s deposits and the buyer’s cash flow, not a policy figure. What a bank calls a down payment is often just the gap between the purchase price and the fraction of it the bank was willing to recognize.
Can you buy a restaurant without an SBA loan?
Yes, and when a seller has a competing offer, it is usually the only path that closes in time. SBA 7(a) is the route most guides assume, and the timeline is the usual problem — it does not fit a seller who is thirty days from signing elsewhere. Revenue-based structures underwrite on deposits and can fund in days; this one funded in 8. The trade-offs are real, and a specialist should walk you through both before you commit to either.
How much working capital do you need after buying a restaurant?
More than most buyers budget. The transition means running every payroll before the combined deposits settle in the new account, re-papering every vendor in the new name — often on worse terms than the seller had — and buying the first sixty days of inventory without the seller’s credit history. For a three-unit group, that was $500K funded as its own layer so it existed on day one rather than becoming a shortfall on day thirty.
How long does it take to finance a restaurant acquisition?
With twelve months of statements for every unit, the buyer’s own bank statements, and a signed letter of intent, a revenue-based structure can fund in days to a couple of weeks; this one funded in 8 days across two layers. What slows a restaurant deal is almost never the lenders. It is a buyer still trying to get a bank past the category.
