The Structure
Three products, one file. The lifts, alignment racks, and diagnostic equipment in three shops are the most financeable thing in the transaction, and they carried themselves as equipment — $350K resolved before the business was priced. The business value across three locations was carried by a term loan underwritten on the combined shop revenue and the buyer’s own operating record. Working capital funded the ninety days when the new owner is running four shops on the old owner’s parts accounts.
A bank wanted a balance sheet to match three shops. Three products underwritten on the revenue of all four funded it in 8 days
Representative structure
| Layer | Amount | What it covered |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition term loan | $950K | Business value across three shops, underwritten on combined revenue and the buyer’s operating history |
| Equipment financing | $350K | Lifts, alignment racks, tire equipment, and diagnostic gear across three shops — each unit securing its own piece |
| Working capital | $200K | The 90-day transition: four payrolls, parts accounts re-papered in the new name, and the seller’s hand-off period |
| Total | $1.5M | Funded together on one application |
Larger multi-shop acquisitions fund the same way when revenue, cash flow, and story qualify.
The Transaction

Bobby Friel
Founder, Basecamp Funding
The version of a shop acquisition nobody prepares you for: you have run a bay for twenty years, the seller trusts you with his customers, and the bank wants to know why a one-shop owner thinks he can afford three more.
A retiring owner put a three-location auto repair chain on the market — established customer bases at every shop, trained technicians in every bay, and a seller who wanted a buyer who would keep both. The buyer, an operator who already ran one shop, had the experience and not the balance sheet a bank wanted for a three-shop purchase. The specialist desk structured a $1.5M stack on the combined shop revenue: a term loan for the business value, equipment financing on the lifts and diagnostic gear, and working capital for the 90-day transition. Funded in 8 days. Every bay stayed open and every customer stayed.
Underwriting
A bank underwrites the buyer’s balance sheet against the size of the purchase. This structure underwrote the combined revenue of the four shops the buyer would own the day after close — and that difference is why one path says no to an experienced operator and the other funds in eight days.
The Bank
A one-shop owner asking for $1.5M. Leased locations it cannot lend against, equipment it will discount, a purchase price that is mostly goodwill, and a personal net worth that does not cover the request. It either declines or offers a fraction against everything the buyer owns.
This Structure
Four shops’ worth of revenue on the day after close — three with years of deposit history under the seller, one with years under the buyer — and an operator who had already done the work in every bay he was buying. Three separate assets, three lenders, each pricing what it holds every day.
Search for auto repair shop financing and most of what you find assumes one shop and one loan. A chain acquisition by an existing operator is a different credit: the question is not whether the buyer can afford three shops on his current income, but whether four shops’ combined revenue services the note — and the seller’s books already answered that. Revenue-based acquisition financing reads the deposits of every location, plus the buyer’s own operating record, and prices the business on what it collects.
Lifts, alignment racks, tire machines, and diagnostic scanners across three shops are titled, appraisable, resaleable assets that equipment lenders price every day. Bundled into an acquisition loan, they get discounted as part of the goodwill. Financed as equipment, $350K of the purchase resolved against the gear itself before anyone argued about business value. That is nearly a quarter of the transaction taken off the table.
A retiring owner with three shops has two kinds of buyers: a consolidator who will rebrand, cut technicians, and churn the customer base, and an operator who will keep both. Most sellers prefer the second and take the first because the first can close. The only way an operator wins that seller is by matching the consolidator’s certainty — a $950K decision underwritten on four shops’ revenue moves in days, and the seller took it.
The last $200K covered what shop-acquisition guides skip: four payrolls running before the combined deposits settle in the new entity, every parts supplier re-papered in the buyer’s name (often on worse terms than the seller had), and the seller’s hand-off period where he introduces the buyer to fleet accounts and long-time customers. Buyers who fund the purchase and not the transition spend the first quarter short on cash in four shops at once.
A purchasing operation instead of a shop — parts pricing improves at volume, a service manager can float across locations, and fleet accounts that need multi-location coverage become winnable. And the group is now the kind of asset a consolidator pays a multiple for, which is the buyer’s exit to think about later, on the buyer’s timeline.
Run the arithmetic your own way: what does your best bay produce per month, and what would twelve of them do under one parts contract and one service manager?
For most operators at this scale, the structure is serviced out of revenue the acquired shops already produce. That is a different question than whether a bank thinks a one-shop owner can afford three more.
The Products
| Product | Role here |
|---|---|
| Business Acquisition Financing → | Business value across three shops, underwritten on combined revenue |
| Equipment Financing → | Lifts, racks, and diagnostic gear across three shops — each unit its own collateral |
| Working Capital → | Four payrolls, parts accounts re-papered, and the seller’s hand-off |
Financing this whole sector: Auto Repair Financing →
The Result
Start Here
Sixty seconds, no documents, and a soft-pull review. If you’re buying a shop — or three — and want to know what the combined revenue actually carries before you sign a letter of intent, this is where that starts.
~60-second review · Soft-pull, FICO untouched · No obligation
No obligation. Soft-pull review — your FICO stays untouched.
Related
Representative scenarios — illustrative, anonymized figures, not specific client transactions.
FAQ
Yes, and for a multi-shop purchase the right structure is rarely one loan. The lifts, racks, and diagnostic gear finance as equipment. The business value finances as a revenue-based acquisition loan on the combined deposits of every location. Working capital funds the transition. Sending each piece to the lender that prices it is what makes the full number reachable on a seller’s timeline.
Both, and together. Revenue-based acquisition financing reads the deposits of every location — the three being acquired and the one the buyer already runs — because that combined revenue is what services the note after close. The buyer’s own operating record prices the transaction. A bank does the opposite: it underwrites the buyer’s personal balance sheet against the purchase price.
There is no fixed percentage on the acquisition piece. What the structure supports is a function of the combined shop revenue and the buyer’s cash flow, not a policy figure. The equipment layer is underwritten against the equipment itself, which typically requires materially less of the buyer’s cash than a bank blending it into one loan.
Yes. Lifts, alignment racks, tire equipment, and scanners are titled, resaleable assets that equipment lenders price every day. Bundled into the acquisition loan they get discounted as goodwill. Financed separately, $350K of this $1.5M purchase resolved against the gear before the business value was priced.
Yes, and when a seller is choosing between an operator and a consolidator, speed is usually what decides it. SBA 7(a) is the route most guides assume, and its timeline is the usual problem. Revenue-based structures underwrite on the combined deposits and can fund in days; this one funded in 8. The trade-offs are real, and a specialist should walk you through both before you commit to either.
Enough to run every location for about ninety days before the combined deposits settle in the new entity: payroll at each shop, parts suppliers re-papered in the buyer’s name — often on tighter terms than the seller had — and the seller’s hand-off period with fleet accounts and long-time customers. For three shops, that was $200K funded as its own layer.
With twelve months of statements for every location, the buyer’s own bank statements, the equipment listed, and a signed letter of intent, a revenue-based structure can fund in days to a couple of weeks; this one funded in 8 days across three layers. What slows a shop deal is a buyer trying to get a bank past his personal balance sheet.