The Structure
Four products, one file. Note where the capital comes from: the fleet secures itself, and the acquiring company’s receivables fund a quarter of the purchase before a single new dollar of debt is priced. Only the remaining balance is underwritten as a term loan — and that number is set by the buyer’s revenue, not the seller’s.
Only $700K of the $4.2M needed a credit decision — the rest secured itself.
Representative structure
| Layer | Amount | What it covered |
|---|---|---|
| Titled fleet assets | $2.1M | 28 tractors — the iron carries itself as collateral |
| A/R facility | $1.0M | The acquiring company’s own receivables, converted to acquisition capital |
| Term loan | $700K | Balance of enterprise value, against the acquirer’s revenue and operating history |
| Post-close integration | $400K | Rebranding, driver retention, and insurance binding across two terminals |
| Total | $4.2M | Funded together on one application |
Larger structures fund the same way when revenue, cash flow, and story qualify.
The Transaction

Bobby Friel
Founder, Basecamp Funding
Forget the price for a second — here’s what this operator was really buying, and why a bank couldn’t see it.
An operator moved to acquire a regional carrier — 28 trucks, two terminals, and $9M in annual revenue. The seller wanted a clean exit and the buyer wanted the freight contracts intact, which put a clock on the whole thing. A revenue-based stack did what a single bank loan couldn’t: equipment financing carried the 28-truck fleet, an A/R facility turned the buying company’s own receivables into acquisition capital, a term loan against the acquirer’s revenue covered the balance of enterprise value, and working capital funded the integration. Funded in 9 days, against the bank’s months.
Underwriting
The bank underwrites the company being sold. This structure underwrote the buyer — and that single difference is most of why a carrier acquisition stalls at a bank and moves through a marketplace.
The Bank
It opens the seller’s financials and looks at depreciated iron, thin retained earnings, and a customer list it cannot pledge. What the buyer is actually purchasing — $9M of annual revenue attached to freight relationships and two terminal locations — does not appear on a balance sheet in a form a credit committee can lend against. So the bank’s number comes in well below what the business is worth to an operator who already knows how to run one, and the gap becomes the buyer’s problem to close in cash.
This Structure
The file is the buying company’s: its revenue, its deposit history, its operating record in the same industry. That is the true measure of whether this transaction gets serviced after close, because the buyer is the one who will be running it. It also means there is no fixed down-payment rule to satisfy — what the structure supports is a function of the acquirer’s revenue, not a percentage a policy manual picked in advance.
Twenty-eight tractors don’t need to be squeezed into a business loan’s collateral package. Financed as equipment, each titled unit secures its own piece, which is exactly what equipment lenders do every day. Half the transaction resolves before anyone argues about enterprise value.
This is the layer most operators never consider. The acquiring company is already carrying $1M of freight receivables on 30-to-60 day terms — money it has earned and is waiting on. An A/R facility converts that to cash at close. It is the buyer funding the purchase out of work already performed, not out of new debt.
A carrier acquisition transfers operating authority, safety rating, and the freight contracts that ride on both. That is the thing being purchased — an operating business with the right to run — and it is precisely what a balance sheet cannot show. It is also why the timeline matters so much: authority transfer and contract assignment have their own clock, and a lender still deciding on the fleet ninety days later is deciding on a different company than the one the buyer agreed to purchase.
After the fleet secures itself and the buyer’s receivables convert, only $700K of enterprise value needs a term loan — underwritten against the acquirer’s revenue. A $700K decision moves in days. A $4.2M decision, at one bank, against the wrong company’s financials, moves in months, and a carrier sale with freight contracts attached does not have months. Drivers leave, shippers hedge, and the seller’s leverage decays while the file sits in committee.
The last $400K is the piece nobody budgets: rebranding two terminals, retaining the drivers who came with the company, and binding insurance across a combined operation before the first load moves under the new name.
The Products
| Product | Role here |
|---|---|
| Equipment Financing → | 28 titled tractors — each unit secures its own piece |
| Accounts Receivable Financing → | The acquirer’s receivables converted to acquisition capital |
| Business Acquisition Financing → | Balance of enterprise value, against the acquirer’s revenue |
| Working Capital → | Post-close rebranding, driver retention, insurance binding |
Financing this whole sector: Trucking & Logistics Financing →
The Result
Start Here
Tell us about the transaction. An advisor reads your file and structures it across the lenders that fit each layer. Soft-pull review — no documents to start, and your FICO stays untouched. You get real term sheets, not a generic range.
Soft-pull review · Real term sheets, not estimates · Underwritten on the acquirer’s revenue
No obligation. Soft-pull review — your FICO stays untouched.
Related
Representative scenarios — illustrative, anonymized figures, not specific client transactions.
FAQ
Rarely with a single loan. A carrier acquisition is usually funded as a stack: the titled fleet is financed as equipment and secures itself, the buyer’s own receivables are converted to cash at close, and only the remaining enterprise value is underwritten as a term loan against the acquiring company’s revenue. Four products, one application — which is how a $4.2M purchase can close in days instead of the months a single bank loan would take.
There is no fixed down-payment rule the way an SBA loan sets one. Because the fleet secures its own financing and receivables fund part of the purchase, the cash a buyer brings is a function of what the acquirer’s revenue supports — not a percentage a policy manual picked in advance. Operators are often surprised how little new cash the structure actually requires.
Yes. SBA is one path, but its timeline and collateral requirements rarely fit a carrier sale with freight contracts on a clock. Revenue-based acquisition financing underwrites the buying company’s cash flow and closes on the timeline the transaction actually has, without the SBA’s paperwork burden.
That is the difference that decides the transaction. A bank prices the target — the company being sold — and lends against its depreciated iron and thin balance sheet, which is why the number comes in low. Revenue-based acquisition financing prices the acquirer: your revenue, your deposit history, your operating record. You are the one who will run it after close, so you are the one underwritten.
Yes — it’s the layer most buyers never consider. An acquiring carrier is typically already carrying freight receivables on 30-to-60 day terms. An A/R facility converts that earned-but-unpaid revenue to cash at close, funding a portion of the purchase out of work already performed rather than out of new debt.
Faster than a bank, because most of the structure secures itself. When the fleet is financed as equipment and the receivables convert, only the smaller term-loan balance needs a credit decision — and a smaller decision moves in days. The acquisition in this case study funded in nine days from start to close.