The Structure
Three products, one file — and the second location never had to qualify on its own. The build-out was carried by a term loan against the existing practice’s collections. The new operatories, which are the most financeable thing in any dental expansion, carried themselves as equipment. Working capital paid the associate and the front desk before the new schedule filled. Every dollar was underwritten on a practice that already produced.
A bank wanted the second clinic to prove itself first. Three products underwritten on the first one funded it in 7 days
Representative structure
| Layer | Amount | What it covered |
|---|---|---|
| Practice expansion term loan | $300K | Build-out of the leased space — plumbing, cabinetry, and finishes — against the existing practice’s collections |
| Equipment financing | $250K | Three new operatories — chairs, delivery units, digital imaging, sterilization — each securing its own piece |
| Working capital | $100K | An associate dentist, a hygienist, and a front desk carried through the first ninety days |
| Total | $650K | Funded together on one application |
Larger multi-location expansions fund the same way when collections, cash flow, and story qualify.
The Transaction

Bobby Friel
Founder, Basecamp Funding
The expansion nobody warns you about: your schedule is full, your patients are asking, the lease is signed — and the bank’s answer is that the new location has no history, so come back in two years with the history.
A dentist with a strong, fully booked practice moved to open a second clinic — a leased space that needed a full operatory build-out, an associate, and a front desk, with an established patient base already asking for it. A bank would have wanted the second location to prove itself before lending against it. The specialist desk underwrote the first one instead: a term loan against the existing practice’s collections carried the build-out, equipment financing took the new operatories as their own collateral, and working capital staffed the second location through its opening months. Funded in 7 days.
Underwriting
A bank underwrites the location being opened. This structure underwrote the practice that already existed — and that difference is why one path says wait two years and the other funded in seven days.
The Bank
A leased space with no revenue, an operatory build-out that is mostly tenant improvements it cannot recover, new equipment it will discount, and payroll for staff serving patients who haven’t booked yet. It calls the second location a startup. It offers a fraction of the number against the dentist’s personal guarantee, or it asks for a track record the clinic cannot have until it opens.
This Structure
A producing practice with years of collections, a recall schedule pushed out past sixty days because the chairs were full, an established patient base in the second location’s trade area, and a dentist who had already done this once. The second clinic was not a startup. It was overflow with a lease.
The question a bank asks — will this new clinic produce? — is the wrong one, because the answer already exists in the first clinic’s books. A practice that is turning away recalls and booking new patients weeks out is not guessing at demand; it is documenting it. Revenue-based expansion financing reads that: the existing collections, the deposit history, the recall backlog. The second location gets funded on the first one’s numbers because the first one’s numbers are the reason the second one exists.
Tenant improvements are what banks like least — plumbing and cabinetry in a space the practice doesn’t own. That $300K was carried by a term loan underwritten on existing collections, which is the only way it should be underwritten. It was sized against what the practice already produces, not against a projection of what the new clinic might.
The chairs, delivery units, imaging, and sterilization are the most readily financed assets in a dental expansion, and equipment lenders price them every day. Bundled into a single expansion loan, they get discounted with the tenant improvements. Financed separately, three operatories carried $250K of the project on their own — over a third of the total resolved before the practice loan was sized at all.
The last $100K paid an associate, a hygienist, and a front desk from the day the doors opened, through the ninety days it takes a new schedule to fill even with an established base. Practices that fund the build-out and not the staffing open with one provider running two locations, and the second one never gets the momentum it was built for.
It buys the recalls the first clinic was pushing out, an associate with a place to produce, and hygiene capacity that turns a full schedule into a growing one. It also turns a solo practice into a group — the kind of asset a corporate buyer pays a premium for, which is the dentist’s exit to think about later, on the dentist’s timeline.
Run the arithmetic your own way: how many recall appointments has your practice pushed out more than sixty days in the last year, and what does each of those produce when it’s seen on time?
For most producing dentists at this scale, the structure is serviced out of collections the second location makes possible. That is a different question than whether a bank will lend against a clinic that hasn’t opened yet.
The Products
| Product | Role here |
|---|---|
| Business Acquisition & Expansion Financing → | Build-out of the second location, against the first one’s collections |
| Equipment Financing → | Three new operatories — each chair, unit, and imaging system its own collateral |
| Working Capital → | Associate, hygienist, and front desk through the first ninety days |
Financing this whole sector: Medical & Dental Practice Financing →
The Result
Start Here
Sixty seconds, no documents, and a soft-pull review. If you’re opening a second location and want to know what your existing practice actually carries before you sign the lease, this is where that starts.
~60-second review · Soft-pull, FICO untouched · No obligation
No obligation. Soft-pull review — your FICO stays untouched.
Related
Representative scenarios — illustrative, anonymized figures, not specific client transactions.
FAQ
Yes — and the right structure underwrites the practice you already run, not the one you’re opening. Revenue-based expansion financing reads the existing clinic’s collections, deposit history, and recall backlog to size the build-out, finances the new operatories as equipment, and funds staffing as its own layer. The second location never has to qualify on a track record it can’t have yet.
Because the new clinic has no revenue and no history, and a bank underwrites the location, not the dentist. The build-out is tenant improvements it can’t recover, the equipment is new and discounted, and the staff serve patients who haven’t booked. So it asks for a track record the clinic cannot produce until it opens — or lends a fraction against a personal guarantee.
The existing practice, first: years of collections, consistent deposits, and evidence of demand the current location can’t absorb — recalls pushed out, new-patient wait times, a full hygiene schedule. Then the dentist’s own record. A producing dentist opening a second clinic in a trade area where patients already come from is a very different credit than a new graduate opening a first one.
No — they finance better on their own. Chairs, delivery units, digital imaging, and sterilization are among the most readily financed assets in dentistry, and equipment lenders price them every day. Bundled into the expansion loan they get discounted alongside the tenant improvements. Financed separately, three operatories carried $250K of this $650K project before the practice loan was sized.
There is no fixed percentage on a revenue-based expansion. What the structure supports is a function of the existing practice’s collections and cash flow, not a policy figure. The equipment layer is underwritten against the equipment itself, which typically requires materially less of the dentist’s cash than a bank blending it into one loan.
Enough to run the second clinic fully staffed for about ninety days before its schedule fills — an associate, a hygienist, and a front desk, paid from opening day. For this expansion that was $100K funded as its own layer. Practices that skip it open with one provider covering two locations, and the second one never builds momentum.
With the existing practice’s bank statements and production reports, the signed lease, and a build-out quote, a revenue-based structure can fund in days; this one funded in 7 across three layers. What slows an expansion is almost never the lenders. It is a dentist waiting on a bank to accept that a full schedule is evidence.